GOODMAN DERRICK LLP is an established London law firm with a broadly based commercial practice, representing both UK and international clients.
 
employment law

     Property Team

    PDFdownload


Management of Asbestos in non-domestic property
- Duty of owners and occupiers

DECEMBER 2008

Asbestos has been used in a wide range of industries and in the construction and refurbishment of buildings from the 1940s to the 1970s. Some forms of asbestos containing materials were still being used until 1999 when prohibited by building control regulations. However, over time it has been revealed that exposure to asbestos carries significant health risks. This has led to a large amount of claims being pursued against companies, employers, property owners, occupiers and so forth.

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 (“CAR 2006”) came into force on 13 November 2006. This creates several rules in relation to managing asbestos in properties. This article will therefore seek to focus on the asbestos-related duties of property owners and occupiers.

Duty to manage asbestos

Regulation 4 of CAR 2006 creates a duty to manage asbestos in non-domestic premises. This Regulation imposes an obligation on the “duty holder” to:

1. determine whether asbestos is present in a building or is likely to be present;

2. assess the risk;

3. manage any asbestos that is or is likely to be present.

Who do the Regulations apply to?

There is a very broad definition of duty holder in the Regulations. This means that a wide range of people could be found liable for breaching their obligations.

The Regulations apply to all owners of non-domestic property, landlords, tenants, licensees and potentially managing agents. The Regulations even apply to freehold owners of non-domestic property who leave their property vacant.

Where a landlord leases the whole of a property, the landlord may retain an obligation to maintain or repair. Alternatively the primary responsibility to repair may rest with the tenant; however the landlord should be aware that they remain a duty holder alongside the tenant and could be held liable. It is therefore essential for property owners and occupiers of property who have repairing obligations to be aware of their asbestos-related duties.

Will the property be non-domestic premises?

The Regulations do not define non-domestic premises. However, it seems that a very broad approach will be taken when deciding whether property is nondomestic or not.

Non-domestic premises include commercial premises, industrial premises, service premises which members of the public visit (e.g. schools, hospitals, prisons) and even certain parts of residential premises (e.g. the common parts in a block of flats).

Duty to assess whether asbestos is present in the premises

A property owner or occupier is under a duty to assess whether asbestos or asbestos-containing material is, or is liable to be present in the premises. The person making this assessment must consider the age of the premises, take account of any building plans and ensure that inspection is made of those parts which are reasonably accessible.

In some circumstances simply making enquiries regarding the construction of a building may be adequate to make an assessment, for example with a recently constructed building.

It seems that the Regulations require a proportionate response. The property owner or occupier must take into account the size and type of building. For example, if the property is a small shop requiring little maintenance, a walk-through inspection may suffice.

In practice the owner/occupier should arrange for an assessment to be carried out by a qualified surveyor. Records of this assessment must be kept.

Where asbestos is present or liable to be present

Where an assessment shows that asbestos is present or liable to be present, the owner/occupier must determine the level of risk. A written plan of action should also be made and kept under review. The plan should identify measures to be taken for managing the risk.

It should be noted that the asbestos should not necessarily be removed from the premises, as this could in fact disturb it, causing more risk. It may be more appropriate to arrange professional sealing or encapsulating of the asbestos.

Tax relief if removal or treatment of asbestos is necessary

Companies may be able to claim a deduction in corporation tax for capital expenditure incurred in carrying out remediation work. Much depends on why the property was acquired (e.g. as trading stock). It seems that in order to claim the relief, it must be proved that the asbestos needs to be removed, because it may cause harm. If the works are not essential, land remediation relief may not be awarded.

Conclusion- Property owners/occupiers beware!

Property owners/ occupiers have key responsibilities in relation to non-domestic properties. It is essential that they carry out an assessment of the risk of asbestos in order to prevent large claims landing on their doorsteps.

Purchasers of property should ask the seller for a copy of their assessment record. It would also be advisable for them to commission their own survey, so that they can rely on this directly. Although purchasers will not become duty holders until completion, they should remain cautious and consider the risk of asbestos.

Landlords and tenants should be particularly cautious about the risk of asbestos. They should ask for a copy of each other’s written plan. They should also both ensure that the other is complying with their obligations in order to avoid becoming liable. Moreover, landlord’s who have passed the majority of the repairing obligations in the lease to their tenant should be aware that they still remain a duty holder and could fall on the wrong side of a claim in the future.

If a property owner/occupier has failed to comply with his obligations under CAR 2006, he faces the possibility of actions against him in the future from employees, contractors or other users of the premises who contract asbestos-related diseases. He also faces the risk of prosecution and could receive a fine (either unlimited or capped at £20,000, depending upon whether the prosecution is by way of summary judgment or indictment) and even a prison sentence.

 

If you would like further information on the content of this newsletter please contact Michael Collins on 0207 404 0606 or mcollins@gdlaw.co.uk.

This is a guide for general information and interest and should not be relied upon as providing specific legal advice.


Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
90 Fetter Lane London EC4A 1PT | t: +44 (0) 20 7404 0606 | f: +44 (0) 20 7831 6407 | DX 122 Chancery Lane
Goodman Derrick LLP © 2007 | Registered number: OC321066.
A limited liability partnership regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
A list of members is available for inspection at our registered office: 90 Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1PT